My Personal Christian Blog

Thanks for sliding into my blog site. This blog bog is a spin-off from my website at http://www.niteowldave.com/. Call me a Night Owl, as my full-time mission and hobby are jabbering from midnight until 8 a.m.ish with chatter bugs across the world. Hoot, hoot! Being a retired newspaper guy and a Curious George, I've written and assembled a whack of stuff that I hope you'll find interesting and thought-provoking. Check out the Stories bar on the right side, below, for all my articles - from my web site and this blog.




March 31, 2008

Why the Resurrection of Jesus Christ validates Him as the Savior

Bill Bright explains evidence and meaning for history's most revolutionary event.

By Bill Bright,
Founder,
Campus Crusade for Christ

Every day, more and more people are taking a look -- for some, a second one -- at the historical person of Jesus of Nazareth. So why do His life and teachings still generate such interest today?

Everything about Him was unique: The prophecies of His coming. His birth. His life. His teachings. His miracles. His death. And especially His resurrection. It is history's most significant event.

The validity of Jesus' claims about Himself rests on the Resurrection — whether He rose from the dead or stayed in the grave.

Many skeptics say that to believe in a risen Christ is nothing more than a blind leap of faith with little or no basis in truth.

When confronted with the facts, however, those who are intellectually honest have been forced to admit that the resurrection is an historical event based on irrefutable proofs.

On my spiritual journey from agnosticism to faith in Christ, I, like many people, had a problem with the resurrection. But my personal study brought me to a firm conviction that a bodily resurrection is the only explanation for Christ's empty tomb. Several evidences helped me reach this conclusion.

Resurrection Evidence

First, Christ predicted His resurrection. The Bible records, "From that time Jesus began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things ... and be killed, and be raised up on the third day" (Matthew 16:21). Even though His followers did not understand what He was telling them at the time, they remembered His words and recorded them.

Second, Jesus made numerous appearances to His followers. He comforted the mourners outside His tomb on Sunday morning. On the road to Emmaus, He explained things about Himself from the Old Testament. Later, He ate in their presence and invited them to touch Him. Scripture records that the risen Jesus was seen by more than 500 at one time. Some may argue that a few people could have agreed to a deception, but how can one explain the collaboration of 500 people?

Third, the unrelenting faith of the disciples convinces me of the resurrection. Those disciples who were once so afraid that they deserted their Lord now courageously proclaimed this news, risking their lives to preach. Their bold and courageous behavior does not make sense unless they knew with absolute certainty that Jesus had been raised from the dead.

Fourth, the growth of the Christian church confirms the resurrection. Peter's first sermon, which dealt with Christ's resurrection, stirred people to receive Him as their living Savior. Luke records the thrilling results: "That day there were added about three thousand souls" (Acts 2:41). And that group of believers has multiplied until now it reaches around the world. Today, there are hundreds of millions of believers.

Finally, the testimony of hundreds of millions of transformed lives through the centuries shows the power of the Resurrection. Many have been delivered from addictions. The destitute and despairing have found hope.

Broken marriages have been restored. The most conclusive proof for the resurrection of Jesus Christ is that He is living within believers today in all of His resurrected life and transforming power. The resurrection sets Christianity apart. No other religious leader has broken the power of death and conquered sin.

Significance of the Resurrection

The resurrection confirms that Jesus is whom He claimed to be. Let us consider the magnitude of this event:

The Resurrection proved that Christ was divine. The fact that Jesus Christ died on the cross does not prove in itself He is God. Jesus proved His deity by fulfilling the prophecies of His death and by His return from the grave.

The Bible declares that "by being raised from the dead [Christ] was proved to be the mighty Son of God, with the holy nature of God Himself" (Romans 1:4,) - The Living Bible.

The resurrection proved Christ's power to forgive sin. The Bible asserts, "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins" (1 Corinthians 15:17). By rising from the dead, Jesus proved His authority and power to break the bonds of sin and to assure forgiveness and eternal life to all who accept His gift of salvation.

The resurrection revealed Christ's power over death. The Bible records, "Christ rose from the dead and will never die again.
Death no longer has any power over him" (Romans 6:9, TLB).
The resurrection secured our victory over death as well and "lifted us up from the grave into glory along with Christ, where we sit with him in the heavenly realms" (Ephesians 2:6).

The resurrection defeated God's enemy. From the moment of his original rebellion until the day of the cross, the devil fought viciously and cunningly to overthrow the kingdom of God.
Satan must have thought he had dealt the final and decisive blow in this age-old war. But this was the devil's most serious miscalculation.

The cross was Heaven's triumph. And when Jesus Christ arose, the power of sin and death was forever shattered. Because of the resurrection, Christians need never fear Satan or death again.

We are to spread His message

For 40 days after His death and resurrection, Christ appeared many times to His followers. On one occasion, He gathered His remaining 11 disciples on a mountain in Galilee and gave them His Great Commission.

He said, "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always" (Matthew 28:19,20).

Later, the Book of Acts records that, on the Mount of Olives, He admonished His disciples to wait in Jerusalem until they were filled with the Holy Spirit and then to take His message to Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and to the ends of the world (Acts 1:4,5,8).

Immediately after, He rose skyward and disappeared into the clouds, leaving the disciples staring after Him in amazed wonder. The ascension of Christ was the final act in the drama of redemption. His mission completed, Jesus Christ was exalted to His former glory.

The resurrection of Jesus Christ ranks as history's most revolutionary event. One cannot deny that He shook the world in His day. But His life just as dramatically has shaped the course of history in our time.

The resurrection is the final proof that Jesus Christ is whom He claimed to be.

Are Roman Catholic teachings supported by the Bible?


There are hundreds of millions of Roman Catholics (RCC) world-wide who are unaware of the dramatic differences between the official teachings, practices, and positions of the Catholic Church, and the teaching of the Holy Bible.

(Look on my website
http://www.niteowldave.com or other related blog stories here for the specifics.)

The inspired Word of God must be the supreme authority from which all of us derive all beliefs and practices.

It makes sense that, at the very least, the New Testament must over-ride man-made traditions where there are conflicts. After all, the 27 books of the New Testament were approved by the Vatican in 393 A.D. at the Council of Hippo in North Africa.

Many sincere Roman Catholics, including laymen and parish priests, have never had sufficient cause to question the teachings of their church because they have never been adequately instructed in the Scriptural truths that challenge the principle doctrines of Catholicism.

Many have not been exposed to the clear, simple truths of the Bible because they have been repeatedly warned to rely on the official interpretations, opinions, and traditions of the church.

The Roman Catholic Church has traditionally suppressed, opposed, and forbidden the open use of the Bible.

It was first officially forbidden to the people and placed on the index of Forbidden Books List by the Council of Valencia in 1229 A.D.

The Council of Trent (1545-63 A.D.) also prohibited its use and pronounced a curse upon anyone who would dare oppose this decree.

Many popes have issued decrees forbidding Bible reading in the common language of the people, condemning Bible societies and banning its possession and translation under penalty of mortal sin and death.

The RCC has openly burned Bibles and those who translated it or promoted its study, reading, and use (John Hus, 1415 A.D.; William Tyndale, 1536 A.D.)

Though external pressures have caused Rome to relax its restrictions and opposition against Bible reading in America, the Bible is still widely withheld and its distribution and free use discouraged in many countries that are heavily influenced by Roman Catholicism.

A RELIGIOUS SYSTEM OF BIBLICAL DISTORTIONS

Roman Catholicism is a system that is comprised of a mixture of truth and error.

On the surface, it appears to many to be a solid brand of Christianity because it staunchly claims to embrace and defend the essential doctrines of the Christian faith.

However, a closer examination proves that it is a system that actually nullifies and distorts Scriptural truth by adding erroneous, man-made teachings that openly contradict the Catholic and non-Catholic Bibles.

For example, the Roman Catholic Church claims the inspiration of the Scriptures, but dilutes the Word of God by exalting the authority of its own traditions, councils, and decrees above the Bible.

Catholicism teaches the deity of Christ, but places Mary and priests as mediators between God and believers so that free access to Jesus is only possible through them.

It teaches the forgiveness of sin, but only through confession to a priest and the absolution given by him.

Catholicism teaches salvation, but substitutes a system of grace plus works in which human works are a necessary element for one's salvation.

It teaches that Christ established the Church, but exalts a man (the pope) as its head and invests absolute, infallible authority in him and his official decrees.

The distinctive features of Catholicism originated several hundred years after the early church was launched by the apostles.


Though the Catholic Church argues that its roots can be traced to Christ, the historical facts do not support this claim.

Roman Catholic dogma has gradually evolved over the centuries. None of its major traditions and doctrines were taught, defended, practiced, or embraced by the apostolic church.

The RCC is all about power and control. It reigns over one billion
people. Sad

March 20, 2008



Do The Roman Catholic Faithful Know That Much Of What They Are Taught Is Not Supported By The Bible?

http://www.biblebb.com/

Hundreds of millions of Roman Catholics (RC) world-wide are largely unaware of the dramatic differences between the official teachings, practices, and positions of the their church and the teachings of the Holy Bible.

They are in the dark because of a lack of clear biblical teaching.
Biblical truth is replaced by the church's man-made traditions.

Despite what the Vatican says, the Word of God must be the supreme authority from which all Roman Catholics - as well as the rest of us - must derive their beliefs and practices.

A CONCILIATORY COMMENT

The fundamental problem confronting the average Roman Catholic is the fact that they are almost completely unaware of what the Catholic Bible really teaches.

Many sincere Catholics, including laymen and parish priests, have never had sufficient cause to question the teachings of their church because it is highly doubtful they have never been adequately instructed in the Scriptural truths that challenge the principle doctrines of Catholicism. If they had, how is it possible they could accept the ever-shifting doctrines handed down by the Vatican as new truth?

Many Roman Catholics - perhaps most -have not been exposed to the clear, simple truths of the Bible because they have been repeatedly warned to rely on the official interpretations, opinions, and traditions of the church. Call it a POWER move.

Even though Catholic versions of the Bible (Jerusalem Bible, New American, and Challoner-Rheims Version of the Latin Vulgate) encourage Bible reading and study (Deut. 6:7-9; Ps. 119:9-11; Acts 17:11), the tragic historical fact is that Catholicism, with very few exceptions, has repeatedly discouraged Bible reading and study, and even banned or restricted its use, distribution, and possession.

THE BIBLE AND ROMAN CATHOLICISM

The Roman Catholic Church has traditionally suppressed, opposed, and forbidden the open use of the Bible.

It was first officially forbidden to the people and placed on the index of Forbidden Books List by the Council of Valencia in 1229 A.D. The Council of Trent (1545-63 A.D.) also prohibited its use and pronounced a curse upon anyone who would dare oppose this decree.

Many popes have issued decrees forbidding Bible reading in the common language of the people, condemning Bible societies and banning its possession and translation under penalty of mortal sin and death.

The Roman Catholic Church has openly burned Bibles and those who translated it or promoted its study, reading, and use (John Hus, 1415 A.D.; William Tyndale, 1536 A.D.)

Though external pressures have caused Rome to relax its restrictions and opposition against Bible reading in America, the Bible is still widely withheld and its distribution and free use discouraged in many countries that are heavily influenced by Roman Catholicism.

A RELIGIOUS SYSTEM OF BIBLICAL DISTORTIONS

Roman Catholicism is a system that is comprised of a mixture of truth and error. On the surface, it appears to many to be a brand of Christianity because it staunchly claims to embrace and defend the essential doctrines of the Christian faith.

However, a closer examination proves that it is a system that actually nullifies and distorts Scriptural truth by adding erroneous, man-made teachings which openly contradict the Catholic and non-Catholic Bibles.

For example, the Roman Catholic Church claims the inspiration of the Scriptures, but dilutes the Word of God by exalting the authority of its own traditions, councils, and decrees above the Bible.

Catholicism teaches the deity of Christ, but places Mary and priests as mediators between God and believers so that free access to Jesus is only possible through them.

It teaches the forgiveness of sin, but only through confession to a priest and the absolution given by him. Catholicism teaches salvation, but substitutes a system of grace plus works in which human works are more important.

It teaches that Christ established the Church, but exalts a man (the pope) as its head and invests absolute, infallible authority in him and his official decrees.

THE GRADUAL DEVELOPMENT OF ROMAN CATHOLIC ERRORS

Before we compare the fundamental teachings of Roman Catholicism with the Catholic Bible, it should be pointed out that the distinctive features of Catholicism originated several hundred years after the early church.

Though the Roman Catholic Church argues that its roots can be traced to Christ, the historical facts do not substantiate this claim. Roman Catholic dogma has gradually evolved over the centuries.

However, none of its major traditions and doctrines were taught, defended, practiced, or embraced by the apostolic church. The following list will indicate the approximate date when the various doctrines, rituals, decrees, and beliefs were instituted:

1. Prayers for the dead. (A.D. 300)
2. Making the sign of the cross. (300)
3. Wax candles. (320)
4. Veneration of angels and dead saints, and use of images. (375)
5. The beginning of mass as a daily celebration. (394)
6. The worship and exaltation of Mary and use of term "Mother of God"(431)
7. Priests begin to dress differently from laity. (500)
8. Extreme unction. (526)
9. The doctrine of purgatory, instituted by Gregory I. (593)
10. The Latin Language used in worship and prayer Gregory I. (600)
11. Prayers directed to Mary, dead saints and angels. (600)
12. Title of "Pope" or "universal bishop" first given to Boniface III.(607)
13. Kissing the pope's foot, began with Pope Constantine. (709)
14. Temporal power of the popes, conferred by Pepin, King of France. (750)
15. Worship of the cross, image, and relics authorized in (786).
16. Holy water, mixed with a pinch of salt and blessed by a priest. (850)
17. Worship of St. Joseph. (890)
18. College of Cardinals established. (927)
19. Canonization of dead saints, first by Pope John XV. (995)
20. Fastings on Fridays and during Lent. (998)
21. The mass developed as a sacrifice and attendance made mandatory. (11th Century)
22. Celibacy of the priesthood, decreed by Pope Gregory VII. (1079)
23. The rosary, used in prayer. (1090)
24. The Inquisition, instituted by the Council of Verona. (1184)
25. Sale of Indulgences. (1190)
26. Transubstantiation, proclaimed by Pope Innocent III. (1215)
27. Auricular (private) confession of sins to a priest, instituted by Pope Innocent III in Lateran Council. (1215)
28. Adoration of wafer (Host), decreed by Pope Honorius III. (1220)
29. Bible forbidden to laymen and placed on Index of Forbidden Books by Council of Valencia. (1229)
30. The Scapular, invented by Simon Stock, an English monk. (1251)
31. Cup forbidden to the people at communion by Council of Constance. (1414)
32. Purgatory proclaimed as a dogma by Council of Florence. (1439)
33. The doctrine of seven sacraments affirmed. (1439)
34. The Ave Maria (Hail Mary) invented and completed 50 years later. (1508)
35. Jesuit order founded by Loyola. (1534)
36.
Tradition declared to be of equal authority with the Bible by Council of Trent. (1545)
37. The Apocryphal books added to the Bible by the Council of Trent. (1546)
38. Mary proclaimed mother of the Church by Pope Paul VI. (1965)
39. Syllabus of Errors, proclaimed by Pope Pius IX and ratified by the Vatican Council; condemned freedom of religion, conscience, speech, press, and scientific discoveries which are disapproved by the Roman Church; reasserted the Pope's temporal authority over all civil rulers. (1864)
40. Infallibility of the pope in matters of faith and morals proclaimed by the Vatican Council. (1870)
41. Public schools condemned by Pope Pius XI. (1930)
42. Assumption of the Virgin Mary (bodily ascension into heaven shortly after her death), proclaimed by Pope XII. (1950)

Many other scriptural abuses and irregularities could be added to this list: Monks, nuns, monasteries, convents, forty days of Lent, holy week, Palm Sunday, Ash Wednesday, All Saints Day, Candlemas Day, fish day, meat days, incense, holy oil, holy palms, St. Christopher medals, charms, relics, novenas, and many more.

This revealing list represents an overview of the many human inventions that have corrupted, distorted, and perverted the official positions presented as truth by the Roman Catholic Church.

ROMAN CATHOLICISM AND TRADITION

The Church of Rome claims that the Bible is the inspired Word of God but, in reality, it supplants and undermines its absolute authority by exalting church traditions, councils, and decrees above the Scriptures.

In fact,
the Council of Trent (1546 A.D.) declared that church tradition was of equal authority with the Word of God.

Roman Catholicism places tradition on an equal and often higher level than the Bible. Roman Catholic traditions, commandments, papal decrees, and councils have repeatedly usurped and contradicted the clear teachings of Scripture.

Rome points to its added section of uninspired books to the Bible, the Apocrypha, as the source for a limited number of their teachings, beliefs, and practices.

These books are not found in the Hebrew Old Testament, and were never referred to as Scripture by Christ or His disciples. They were not even sanctioned by the Catholic Church until the Council of Trent in 1546 A.D.

However, Jesus rebuked the usurping and undermining of Scriptures through man-made tradition when He said "The worship they offer me is worthless, the doctrines they teach are only human regulations.

"You put aside the commandment of God to cling to HUMAN TRADITIONS. . .In this way you make God's word null and void for the sake of your TRADITION which you have handed down." (MK 7:7, 8, 13, J.B.V.).


Such prominent Roman Catholic doctrines and practices as the mass, purgatory, the priesthood, Transubstantiation, prayers for the dead, indulgences, penance, the worship of Mary, the use of images in worship, holy water, rosary beads, the celibacy of priests and nuns, the papacy, and many others are based totally upon tradition and are without the slightest shred of Scriptural support to substantiate them.
In fact, the Bible gives strong witness against many of these teachings and practices.

THE VIRGIN MARY

In spite of the great emphasis upon Mary in Roman Catholicism, the Bible says very little about her. In fact, she is never even mentioned by Peter, Paul, James, or John. Furthermore, none of the New Testament epistles refer to her either.

This is significant in light of the elaborate system of Mariology created by Rome with its Mary works, veneration, and devotions. What is even more surprising is the fact that some of the most significant teachings concerning Mary are of fairly recent origin ( the Assumption of Mary, (1950).

Though the Bible honors Mary as the mother of Jesus and calls her "blessed. . .among women" (not above women, Lk 1:28), it does not teach us to deify her, worship her, or pray to her.

The Scriptures recognize Mary as a woman of humility, obedience, and virtue, but reject Rome's adoration of her on the grounds that it is idolatrous worship condemned by the Word of God.

About Mary:

1.
Rome claims that Mary acts as a mediator between sinners and God, and teaches that sinners receive pardon through Mary.
This is refuted by the Scriptures. "For there is only one God, and there is only one mediator between God and mankind, himself a man, Christ Jesus" (1 Tim. 2:5, J.B.V.). Jesus said, "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one can come to the Father except through me" (Jn 14:6, J.B.V.).

2. "The Holy Church commands a worship peculiar to Mary", but the Bible rejects this demand on the ground that it is idolatry. The worship of Mary in the form of prayers (Hail Marys), songs to her, and kneeling before her statues is blatant idolatry specifically forbidden by Christ: "You must worship the Lord your God, and serve him alone" (Matt. 4:10, J.B.V.).

3. Catholicism teaches that Christ is a stern, wrathful judge who cannot be approached by sinners. It teaches that Mary, on the other hand, is a tender understanding, merciful intercessor who is more sympathetic and compassionate than Christ and will plead our cause to her Son with the forceful persuasion of a loving mother.

But the Bible rejects Rome's claim that Mary is an intercessor or advocate who intercedes to God on our behalf in order to obtain grace for the sinner.

The Bible declares that Jesus Christ is at the right hand of God where "He stands and pleads for us" (Rom. 8:34, J.B.V.),--not Mary
and that He is "living forever to intercede for all who come to God through Him" (Heb. 7:25, J.B.V.; see also Heb. 9:24).

4. The Bible rejects Rome's claim that "Mary is the Peacemaker between sinners and God". The Bible states, "But now in Christ Jesus, you that used to be so far apart from us have been brought very close, by the blood of Christ. . .For he is the peace between us. . .Through him, both of us have in the one Spirit our way to come to the Father" (Eph. 2:13, 14, 18, J.B.V.). Christ is our peacemaker, not Mary, priests, popes, dead saints, or even the Church.

5. The Bible rejects Catholic claims that Mary is ". . .the gate of heaven because no one can enter that blessed kingdom without passing through Her", that "the Way of Salvation is open to none other than through Mary, and that our salvation is in the hands of Mary."

"Neither is there salvation in any other. For there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved" (Acts 4:12, C.R.V.). "Jesus said: I am the Way. . .No one can come to the Father except through me" (Jn 14:6, J.B.V.).

6. The Bible gives absolutely no support to the many exalted titles which the Roman Catholic Church has bestowed upon Mary such as, "Queen of the Angels, Prophets, Patriarchs, Apostles, Confessors, Virgins, and All Saints"(7), "The Door of Paradise," "The Gate of Heaven," "Our Life," "Mother of Grace," "Morningstar," "Refuge of Sinners," and "Mother of Mercy". These titles represent Rome's attempts to elevate Mary to a glorified position that is not taught in the Scriptures.

7. The doctrine of the Immaculate Conception which teaches that Mary was born without sin is contrary to the Scriptures which stress that "everyone has sinned" (Rom. 5:12, 13 J.V.B.), and "there is no man who does not sin" (1 Kg. 8:46, J.B.V.; see also Ps. 53:3, 1 Jn. 1:8, 10).

Even Mary acknowledged that she was a sinner in need of a Savior: "My soul proclaims the greatness of the Lord and my spirit exults in GOD MY SAVIOR" (
Lk. 1:46, 47, J.B.V.).

8. The Roman Catholic doctrine of the Assumption of Mary which teaches that Mary's body was raised from the dead and taken to heaven as "Queen of Heaven" is a teaching which can't find the slightest support in the Bible and was not made an official doctrine in the Catholic Church until 1950.

9. Roman Catholicism's emphasis on Mary's perpetual virginity is clearly refuted in the Bible that (that strongly suggests) Jesus had brothers and sisters (Matt. 13:54-56; Mk. 6:3; Jn. 7:5, 6).

Though Rome claims that these verses refer to Christ's cousins, the original Greek wording clearly refers to brothers and not cousins. After the virgin birth of Christ, Mary and Joseph lived a normal husband and wife relationship, bearing other children.

1.
Bishop Alphonse de Liguori, The Glories of Mary, pp. 82, 83.
2. Ibid., pg. 130.
3. Bishop Alphonse de Liguori, The Glories of Mary, pg. 80; see also pp. 254, 257.
4. Ibid., pg. 197.
5. Bishop Alphonse de Liguori, The Glories of Mary, pg. 160.
6. Ibid., pg. 169.
7. St. Joseph's Daily Missal, pg. 1305.

THE PAPACY

The word "pope" comes from the Latin word "papa" meaning father. Most scholars agree that the first real pope was Gregory I (590- 604 A.D.).

The pope claims to be the mediator between God and men with the power over souls in purgatory. However, the Bible contradicts this claim by stating that "For there is only one God, and there is only one mediator between God and mankind, himself a man, Christ Jesus" (I Tim 2:5 J.B.V.).

The papacy attempts to usurp the power and authority belonging solely to Christ by claiming the pope as the head of the church, but the Bible declares that Jesus is the head of the Church (Col. 1:18), and that "He has put all things under his feet, and made him, as the ruler of everything, the head of the Church; which is his body" (Eph. 1:22, 23, J.B.V.; see also Col. 2:9, 10).

The pope also claims the titles of "His Holiness" or "The Holy Father" in direct violation of Christ's warnings to His followers: "You must call no one on earth your father, since you have only one Father, and he is in heaven" (Matt. 23:9, 10, J.B.V.).

PAPAL INFALLIBILITY

The doctrine of papal infallibility was ratified in 1870 when the Vatican Council decreed that papal judgments involving faith and morals were infallible when spoken "ex-cathedra," meaning in his official capacity as head of the church while sitting in the chair of St. Peter.

However, the concept of the papacy and papal infallibility can find no justification in the Scriptures.


Most Catholics are unaware of the scandalous history of the Roman papacy. The historical record of papal corruption causes extreme embarrassment to the church in its attempts to defend papal infallibility and its moral authority.

For this reason, the church hierarchy endeavors to deny, suppress, and cover-up the historical facts concerning its many doctrinal and moral abuses.

What makes the idea of papal infallibility and purity so absurd is its notorious record of papal corruption, contradictions, inconsistencies, and reversals during its history.

Though most popes were men of integrity and high moral character, many were wicked and corrupt. What is more, these facts can be easily substantiated by secular, Protestant, and even Catholic sources!

As shocking and unbelievable as it may seem, many popes were guilty of committing nearly every crime in the catalog of sin including rape, adultery, fornication, incest, murder, assassinations, robbery, conspiracy, bribery, fraud, perjury, and the purchase of the papacy with money.

The corruption and gross immorality of 29 popes was so flagrant that Rome has listed them as "anti-popes" in order to minimize the scandalous testimony of the papacy and erase this notorious blot from their history.

Some popes have contradicted each other (Sixtus V recommended Bible reading, while Pope Pius VII condemned it); some popes condemned scientific truth (Paul V and Urban VIII tortured and imprisoned Galileo for teaching that the earth revolves around the sun).

Many have promoted and defended doctrinal heresies in direct conflict with the clear teachings of Scripture; and some have endorsed massacres, atrocities, torture, imprisonment, and inquisitions against Rome's opponents resulting in the deaths of millions!

1.
Ludwig Pastor, History of the Popes (a Roman Catholic historian).
2. H.H. Halley, Halley's Bible Handbook, pp. 767-793.
3. Glen D. Kittler, The Papal Princes (a Roman Catholic author), 358 pages.
4. John Foxe, Foxes Book of Martyrs.

PAPAL DECREES

The following selected examples are only a few of the many abuses demonstrated through papal decrees:
Innocent III (1198-1216 A.D.) claimed the right to dispose of kings, ordered the extermination of heretics, instituted the Inquisition, ordered the massacre of Albigenses, condemned the Magna Charta, and forbade Bible reading in the common language;

Innocent IV (1241-54 A.D.) sanctioned torture of suspected heretics to extract confessions;
Nicolas V (1447-55 A.D.) authorized war on African peoples and their enslavement;
Sixtus IV (1471-84 A.D.) sanctioned the Spanish Inquisition;
Leo X (1513-21 A.D.) declared the burning of heretics a divine appointment;

Clement XI (1700-21 A.D.) issued a papal bull (pronouncement) against Bible reading; condemned all religious freedom, tolerance, Bible societies, and Bible translations.

Pius IX (1846-78 A.D.) decreed papal infallibility, condemned separation of church and state, denounced Liberty of Conscience, Liberty of Worship, freedom of speech, freedom of press, decreed the Immaculate Conception and deity of Mary, condemned Bible societies, and proclaimed the right to suppress heresy by force; Leo XIII (1878-1903 A.D.) pronounced Protestants "enemies of the Christian name".

MORTAL AND VENIAL SINS

Roman Catholicism divides sins into two categories: 1.) Mortal sins which are defined as serious offenses against God that can damn a soul to eternal punishment, and 2.) Venial sins that are dealt with as a lesser of a place referred to as "purgatory".

There is no uniform agreement among priests concerning that sins are venial or mortal. Mortal sins could include not attending mass, breaking Ten Commandments, sexual offenses, reading a Protestant Bible, or going to a Protestant church.

Venial sins could be anything a priest decides. Only a priest can forgive mortal sins, but both mortal and venial sins must be paid for by temporal penance and inevitable punishment in purgatory.

The Bible makes no distinction between mortal and venial sins. Though some sins are worse than others, all unrepented, unforgiven sins will keep a soul out of heaven. It simply teaches that "the wage paid by sin is death" (Rom. 6:23, J.B.V.), and that "The man who has sinned, he. . . shall die" (Eze. 18:4, J.B.V.).

CONFESSION

The Baltimore Catechism defines confession as "the telling of our sins to an authorized priest for the purpose of obtaining forgiveness."
Catholicism stresses that priests have the power and authority to forgive sins without even asking God!

Forgiveness involves the assigning of penance, punishments in the form of good works, a certain number of prayers, fastings, or abstinence from certain pleasures as a token of repentance. Priests can forgive the guilt of mortal sins, but cannot remit the penalty that must be paid through the performance of good works that he chooses to prescribe.

Under penalty of committing a mortal sin, every Roman Catholic is required to go to confession at least once a year. However, the Bible gives no support for private (auricular) confession to a priest for receiving the forgiveness of sins.

Furthermore, this practice didn't originate until the 5th century and wasn't officially made compulsory until the Fourth Laterin Council in 1215 A.D.

Even the Catholic Bible challenges the concept of Catholic confession on the grounds that no mortal man possesses the power to forgive or absolve sins, and clearly reveals that God alone can forgive sins; "WHO CAN FORGIVE SINS BUT ONLY GOD?" (Mk. 2:7, C.R.V.).
No priest has the authority to forgive sins but "the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins" (Matt. 9:6, J.B.V.).

By establishing a priest as the official forgiver of sins, the Catholic Church usurps Christ's exclusive position and authority to act as the mediator between God and man:

"For there is only one God, and there is only one mediator between God and mankind, himself a man, Christ Jesus" (I Tim 2:5, J.B.V.; see also Heb. 8:6; 9:15).

The Bible further declares that, "if any one should sin, we have our advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ, who is just" (I Jn. 2:1 J.B.V.).


The Scriptures also teach that each individual Christian has the privilege of going directly to God for forgiveness: "but if we acknowledge our sins, then God. . .will forgive our sins and purify us from everything that is wrong" (I Jn., 1:9, J.B.V.).

Peter confirmed that men receive the remission of sins directly from Christ not through priests: "all who believe in Jesus will have their sins forgiven through his name" (Acts 10:43, J.B.V.;see also Acts 13:38, 39). 1 Instructions for Non-Catholics, pg. 93.

PENANCE

The sacrament of penance involves the performance of good works that the priest assigns after confession. According to Catholic teaching, God does not cancel out all the punishment due the sinner when he is forgiven, and thus requires works of penance to help relieve the penalty.

Those sins that cannot be fully paid by simple penance (such as "The Act of Contrition," the recital of a given number of "Hail Marys," "Our Fathers," or stations of the cross) must eventually be paid for by suffering in purgatory until the debt is cleared.

However, the Scriptures say nothing about penance. God does not demand outward penance but inward repentance, and a turning from sinful practices: "Let the wicked man abandon his way. . .Let him turn back to Yahweh who will take pity on him, to our God who is rich in forgiving" (Isa. 55:7, J.B.V; see also Prov. 28:13)

The Bible clearly teaches that our sins are completely cleansed and forgiven through Christ when we repent directly to Him; "but if we acknowledge our sins, then God. . .will forgive our sins and purify us from everything that is wrong" (I Jn. 1:9 J.B.V.). God bases complete, unconditional forgiveness and cleansing upon sincere repentance and a forsaking of sin.

The main error in penance is the false assumption that Christ's sacrifice was insufficient to totally atone for sin and must be supplemented by human works.

The Roman Catholic teaching that "penance is necessary for salvation" and "whosoever shall affirm that men are justified solely by the imputation of the righteousness of Christ. . .let him be accursed" is a blatant perversion of the biblical teaching of justification by faith apart from works.

The fundamental error of Catholicism is its unscriptural emphasis upon a complicated system of salvation by good works and human effort. Though good works are a natural outgrowth of genuine faith and salvation, they can never save us--they are the result, not the cause of salvation.

No man can earn salvation by meritorious works. Only through the justifying grace of God through faith are we saved: "For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not from yourselves, for it is the gift of God: not as the outcome of works, lest anyone may boast" (Eph 2:8, 9, C.R.V.).

Catholicism contradicts the truth that "Man is not justified by the works of the Law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ. . .because by the works of the Law no man will be justified" (Gal. 2:16, C.R.V.; see also Rom. 1:17; 3:21, 22, 28; 5:1; 10:3; 11:6; Gal 2:21; Titus 3:5).
1. The Catholic Almanac, pp. 269, 559.
2. The Council of Trent.

PURGATORY

Rome teaches that when Catholics die in an unperfected state, they must enter an intermediate realm of punishment called "purgatory" before being released to heaven. Those who have accumulated sins that have not been sufficiently atoned for through penance must endure the sufferings of purgatory until the soul is refined and God's justice has been satisfied.

The torments of this halfway hell can vary in intensity, severity, and duration depending upon the guilt, impurity, lack of proper penance, or sorrow of the sufferer.

Catholics are kept in fear all their lives by the prospects of going to this imaginary place. But Rome teaches that the period of suffering in purgatory can be shortened by gifts of money, prayers by the priests, and masses.

Catholicism also stresses that friends and relatives can help lessen the time that loved ones remain in purgatory and even relieve their suffering by financing masses on their behalf.

Rome collects millions of dollars each year from grieving individuals who willingly pay to alleviate the agonies of those in purgatory.

This frightening doctrine cannot find a single verse in the entire Bible to support it. Rome has had to rely on ingenious twistings of the Scriptures to defend this terrifying teaching, along with an isolated passage from the apocryphal book of II Maccabees (12:39-45).

The concept of purgatorial sufferings after death challenges the very work of Christ on our behalf. The Bible declares that "Christ himself. . .had died once for sins" (I Pet. 3:18, J.B.V.). There is no more need for further sufferings in purgatory.

To demand further suffering and sacrifice is to deny that Christ's sacrifice was sufficient the first time! Jesus said that "he who hears my word. . .has life everlasting and does not come to judgment, but has passed from death to life" (Jn. 5:24, C.R.V.).

The Bible also teaches that "if we acknowledge our sins, then God. . .will forgive our sins and purify us from everything that is wrong" (1Jn. 1:9, J.B.V.); that God remembers our sins no more (Heb. 10:17); that to die is gain, not torment (Phil. 1:21, 22); that to be away from the body is to be at home with the Lord (II Cor. 5:8, 9); and that those who die in Christ are blessed and receive rest from their labors and not excruciating pain (Rev. 14:13).

INDULGENCES

An indulgence is "the remission or limited release from the temporal punishments one must suffer in this life or in purgatory for the sins a person has committed." Indulgences can even be granted to souls already in purgatory to shorten their stay.

Both penance and indulgences originated during the Middle Ages and have been commonly associated with fraud and corruption.

At times, Rome has openly sold indulgences to raise revenues. Money raised from the selling of indulgences by emissaries appointed by Pope Leo X (1513-21 A.D.) helped finance the construction of St. Peter's Basilica.

It was the public selling of them by Friar Tetzel who claimed that "a soul is released from purgatory and carried to heaven as soon as the money tinkles in the box" That outraged Martin Luther and helped launch the Protestant Reformation (1517 A.D.).

The whole system of indulgences violates Scriptural truth and cannot be supported by the Bible. Its practice amounts to placing a price tag on salvation and perverting the message of salvation by grace.

THE ASSURANCE OF SALVATION

The consequence of the doctrines of penance, indulgences, and purgatory is that Roman Catholics can never have assurance or a genuine sense of spiritual security concerning their salvation.

All that a dying Catholic can be sure of after death is that he will suffer an indefinite period of excruciating punishment in the flames of purgatory.

In fact, the Council of Trent even pronounced a curse upon any who presumed to say that he had assurance of salvation, or that the whole punishment for sin is forgiven along with that sin.


The Bible says that "the blood of Jesus. . .purifies us from all sin" (I Jn. 1:7, J.B.V.). It also assures us of our salvation and eternal life. "This is the testimony: God has given us eternal life and this life is in his Son" (I Jn. 5:11, J.B.V.; see also 5:13).

Jesus also guaranteed us that "he who hears my word, and believes him who sent me, has life everlasting, and does not come to judgment, but has passed from death to life" (Jn. 5:24, C.R.V.), and "He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; he who is believing towards the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God rests upon him" (Jn. 3:36, C.R.V.).

PETER

Roman Catholicism endeavors to defend the papacy by claiming that Peter was the first pope and was personally appointed by Christ.
They base this claim upon their interpretation of Matthew 16:13-19 in which Jesus responds to Peter's confession that He is the Christ by declaring that upon this rock He will build His Church and will give the keys of the kingdom to Peter to bind and loose upon the earth.

The papacy claims that Peter is the rock, and the keys represent the pope's absolute authority and infallibility over the Church.

However, Jesus was not saying He would build His church upon Peter, but upon the simple foundational confession of faith that Peter made that Jesus is the Christ. The church is not built upon Peter, but Christ--Christ is the rock, not Peter (I Cor. 3:11, 12; Eph. 2:20, 21).

The "keys" symbolize the authority to open the way of salvation through the preaching of the gospel to all those who are bound in darkness and sin.

Peter was first entrusted with the keys because he was the first to give this confession of faith in Jesus and was instrumental in initially opening the door of salvation to the Jews at Pentecost (Acts 2), as well as the Gentiles at Cornelius' house (Acts 10).

All true disciples possess the keys when proclaiming the way of salvation to unbelievers and offering them spiritual liberty through Christ (Matt. 18:18).

Furthermore, the Scriptures disprove Catholic claims concerning Peter. Neither the Bible nor Peter ever claimed to be a pope, head over the church, or in a superior position over the other apostles. He simply referred to himself as an elder among many (I Pet. 5:1).

Peter challenged the dictatorial nature of the papacy by warning ministers not to lord over the flock. (I Pet. 5:3). Peter refused to receive homage from men (Acts 10:25-27). Peter proved he wasn't infallible when Jesus sharply rebuked him for challenging the need of the crucifixion (Matt. 16:23), and Paul scolded him for his vacillation, inconsistency, and spiritual hypocrisy (Gal. 2:11-14).

Peter was married (Matt 87:14; Lk. 4:38; I Cor. 9:5). When Paul wrote the epistle to the Romans, he greeted many believers but never mentioned Peter (Rom.16); and what is more, apart from Catholic tradition, there is no biblical, historical, or credible archaeological evidence that Peter ever went to Rome or presided as its supreme bishop.

THE PRIESTHOOD

Roman Catholicism has established a priesthood that serves as mediator between God and man to offer blood sacrifices for an individual's sins in the form of the mass.
The function and structure of the Catholic priesthood, which includes a sacrificial system (mass), is of Jewish origin and was abolished through Christ.

Christians no longer require human priests to serve as mediators by offering sacrifices for them or forgiving and remitting their sins through confession.

The Bible gives no support to Rome's attempt to place the priest between the confessor of sins and the forgiveness of sins, or to exalt the priesthood as mediator between the sinner and God.

The Bible declares that "For there is only one God, and. . .one mediator between God and mankind. . .Christ Jesus" (I Tim 2:5, J.B.V.), regardless of the religious title, no man has the power to forgive sins (Mk.2:7).

Furthermore, every believer has free, unrestricted access to God's grace through prayer (Rom. 5:2; Heb. 4:16). There is no need to repeat Christ's sacrifice for sins because it has been accomplished once and for all (Heb.9:26; 10:10-14). Any attempts to do so is an abomination before God.

Though the New Testament lists various kinds of ministries and offices within the church (Eph. 4:11, 12; I Cor. 12:28, 29; I Tim 3), it never mentions the Roman Catholic concept of a priesthood.

According to Peter, the Christian priesthood is a universal priesthood consisting of all true believers and is not the exclusive privilege of a select few: "so that you too, THE HOLY PRIESTHOOD that offers the spiritual sacrifices. . .you are a chosen race, A ROYAL PRIESTHOOD, a consecrated nation, a people set apart" (I Peter 2:5, 9, J.B.V.; see also Rev. 1:5, 6).

The Catholic concept of the priesthood is unscriptural and didn't even originate until the 3rd century. Furthermore, there is no reference to such titles as archbishop, cardinal, or pope, and the requirement of the celibacy of the priesthood is an idea condemned by the Apostle Paul (I Tim. 4:1-3).

In fact, when Paul listed the qualifications for bishops (elders), he stated that they must "not have been married more than once" (I Tim. 3:2, J.B.V.; see also Titus 1:6).

MASS

The biblical teachings concerning communion are radically opposed to the official Roman Catholic position regarding the mass.

(1) While Protestants view communion as a source of spiritual blessing and a symbolic sacrament commemorating Christ's sacrifice on our behalf, Catholics claim that it is the same sacrifice as Christ's death on the cross, and view it as a reenactment of Christ's crucifixion on Calvary in an unbloody manner.

(2) Mass is a ritual officiated by a priest it which Christ's body is recrucified and resacrificed for the atonement of an individual's sins. Catholicism further teaches that the physical presence of Christ is in the sacrifice, and that the wine and wafer ("host") are miraculously changed into the actual blood and body of Jesus Christ (the doctrine of Transubstantiation).

The Catholic concept of the mass was unheard of in the early church and was not invented until 831 A.D. by a Benedictine monk named Radbertus. It did not become an official doctrine until the Fourth Laterin Council in 1215 A.D.

The doctrine of Transubstantiation wasn't proclaimed until 1215 A.D. by Pope Innocent the III, and did not become an official creed until 1564 A.D.

The elaborate ritualism associated with the mass is unscriptural in that it stresses that Christ's sacrifice for sins was insufficient the first time.

The Bible repeatedly stresses the finality and completeness of Christ's sacrifice and challenges any need for it to be repeated, reoffered, renewed, or perpetuated through mass: And every priest indeed stands daily ministering and often offering the same sacrifice which can never take away sins.

"But Jesus, having offered ONE SACRIFICE for sins, has taken his seat forever at the right hand of God. . .For by ONE OFFERING he has perfected forever those who are sanctified. . .Now where there is a forgiveness of these, there is no longer offering for sin" (Heb. 10:11, 12, 14, 18, C.R.V.; see also 7:27; 9:12, 22-28).

Even Jesus challenged the need for repeating His sacrifice for sins when He declared: "It is finished" (Jn. 19:30, C.R.V.); and Peter confirmed that "Christ himself. . .died ONCE for sins, died for the guilty, to lead us to God" (I Pet. 3:18, J.B.V.).

1.
II Vatican Council documents on the mass.
2. John A. O'Brian, The Faith of Millions, pg. 382 (Roman Catholic).

RITUALISM

1. Roman Catholic Ritualism can find no basis of support in the Bible. The gorgeous vestments, colorful processions, exotic pageantry, mystifying symbolism, stately music, dim cathedral lighting, flickering candles, tinkling bells, and sweet-smelling incense is contrary to the character, conduct, and spirit of Christianity.

The dazzling theatrical display of pomp and pageantry, the splendor of priests arrayed in costly jewels and apparel, and the elaborate spectacle of ceremonies and liturgies associated with Roman Catholicism is hardly in keeping with the purity and simplicity demonstrated by Christ, the apostles, and the early church.

Even Peter warned against the wearing of gold, jewelry, or the putting on of rich robes (I Pet. 3:3, 4). The external ritualism of Roman Catholicism is a superficial, religious display designed to impress the natural senses, but lacks the transforming power of the gospel and the Spirit of Christ to change the heart or save a soul from hell.

2. Images, Statues, Shrines, and Pictures—The Roman Catholic Church officially sanctioned the worship of images and pictures in 787 A.D. at the Council of Nicaea. However, the veneration of images, statues, pictures, and shrines of Christ, Mary, dead saints, and angels is nothing more than blatant idolatry strictly forbidden by the Bible:

"Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing, nor the likeness of ANYTHING that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath. . .Thou shalt not adore them, nor serve them" (Ex. 20:4,5, C.R.V.; see also Lev. 26:1). In fact, the Bible pronounces a curse upon all those who do! (Deut. 27:15).

3. The Use of Relics—The widespread use of relics consisting of a piece of bone, a fragment of a saint's body, or some article which a deceased saint touched during his life for the purpose of adoration, worship, or the impartation of blessings and miracles is simply fetishism and rank superstition borrowed from pagan practices.
It has no support in the Scriptures. The attributing of supernatural power to such relics is simply another form of idolatry condemned by the Word of God.

4. The Use of the Rosary—The rosary is a device consisting of a chain of beads used in the ritualistic counting of repetitious prayers such as Hail Marys and The Lord's Prayer. It was first introduced by a monk named Peter the Hermit (1090 A.D.), but was not officially sanctioned until the 16th century.

The repetitious recital of prayers is a heathen practice specifically condemned by Christ: "In your prayers do not babble as the pagans do, for they think that by using many words they will make themselves heard. Do not be like them" (Matt. 6:7,8, J.B.V.; see also N.A.B.).

5. The Wearing of the Scapular—The Scapular is a piece of brown cloth with the picture of the Virgin Mary which is worn over the shoulders next to the skin for the purpose of protecting the wearer from evil and danger. It was introduced by Simon Stock, an English monk, in 1287 A.D.

This, like the wearing of St. Christopher medals, is nothing but superstition and fetishism which is practiced by pagan religions and primitive tribes in heathen countries, and condemned as idolatry by the Bible.

6. The Use of Incense, Candles, and Holy Water in Roman Catholic worship can find no grounds of support in the Bible. Christians are called to worship the Father in Spirit and truth. This is what the Father is seeking for among believers (Jn. 4:23).

Our worship is not to be adulterated with the trappings of pagan idolatry and empty ritualism. The use of none of these elements can be found in the New Testament or the practice of the early church.

7. Prayers, Masses, and Other Rituals for the Dead—A common practice among Roman Catholics are prayers for the dead in order to improve their condition in purgatory and eternal destiny.

These practices are in conflict with the Bible that teaches that the status of the dead, whether they be righteous or wicked, is fixed and irrevocable.

The only opportunity men have for determining their eternal destiny is in this present life. All of our ritualism on their behalf after death avails nothing and cannot alter their condition, for "men only die once, and after that comes judgment" (Heb. 9:27, J.B.V.).

CONCLUSION

We have carefully compared the major teachings of Roman Catholicism with the Bible and have shown it is a religious system composed of many man-made practices and teachings that often contradict the clear truths contained in the Word of God.

The Scriptural facts should offer a sobering challenge to all Roman Catholics who love God and earnestly desire to follow the truth.

Though this article has not attempted to question the religious sincerity, devotion, and dedication of Roman Catholics nor deny that some have had a genuine, "born-again" experience in Christ, it does endeavor to inform Catholics of the Scriptural errors of Roman Catholicism and challenge them accordingly.

We must each recognize that it is difficult to serve God acceptably and be approved by Christ if we willfully continue to condone teachings or participate in practices that violate the Holy Scriptures.

Jesus revealed that the true test of commitment and love for God is obedience and loyalty to the truth: "If you love me you will keep my commandments" (Jn. 14:15, J.B.V.; see also I Jn. 2:3, 4; II Jn. 9). An important fruit of salvation is obedience to those truths that have been revealed to us in the Bible.

A persistent unwillingness to respond to Scriptural truth is usually an indication that an individual has not fully surrendered his life to Christ's Lordship. Furthermore, the Scriptures clearly caution us that "Everyone who knows what is the right thing to do and doesn't do it commits a sin" (James 4:17, J.B.V.).

The inevitable challenge confronting Catholics is whether they are willing to risk salvation and eternal life by continuing to rely upon a religious system which openly contradicts the Bible. Will you take the steps to embrace God's Word without reservation and follow Christ in absolute obedience?

This is a courageous decision that each Roman Catholic must personally settle in his or her own heart. It is a crucial choice that confronts all conscientious Catholics who sincerely desire to embrace the truth and trust solely in Jesus Christ for their salvation.

For a more comprehensive treatment of this important subject, we recommend reading Roman Catholicism, by Lorraine Boettner, and Foxes Book of Martyrs, by John Foxe
.

March 13, 2008



Why the Rapture will occur before the Tribulation


By Dave Hunt

The Rapture of the Christian "church" involves all believers of Jesus Christ being caught up to Heaven. The Bible says it includes those who have died as followers of Jesus Christ together with those alive at the time (1 Thes 4:13-18).

If it occurs at the beginning of the tribulation period, then clearly Christ’s Second Coming at the end of the Tribulation to rescue Israel in the midst of Armageddon is a separate event.
According to
Zechariah 14:3-5, “all the saints” must accompany Christ back to earth.

But if the Rapture occurs at the end of the Tribulation, it must be simultaneous with the Second Coming, making them one event.

Which is it: Two events separated by seven years, or one event with two diverse purposes?

This question, though it has nothing to do with the gospel of salvation, divides much of the evangelical church. Happily, it can be settled rather easily.

The descriptions in Scripture of the Rapture and Second Coming respectively are so different in so many details that they could not possibly be describing the same occurrence. We can’t cover all of these distinctions, but here are a few:

1. At the Rapture, Christ does not return to earth but catches believers up to meet Him above the earth, taking them directly to heaven: “I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also” (
Jn 14:3); “caught up...to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord” (1 Thes 4:17).

In contrast, at the Second Coming Christ returns to this earth to rule Israel and the world from David’s throne in Jerusalem: “his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem” (
Zec 14:4); “the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end” (Lk 1:32, 33); “And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him....The armies which are in heaven followed him....Out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and shall rule them with a rod of iron” (Rv 19:11-15).

2. At the Rapture there is a resurrection of all believers who have died up to that time: “the dead shall be raised incorruptible” (
1 Cor 15:52, 53); “the dead in Christ shall rise first...” (1 Thes 4:16).

In contrast, at the Second Coming there is no resurrection until Antichrist is defeated, he and the false prophet have been “cast alive into a lake of fire” (Rv 19:20) and Satan has been bound in the “bottomless pit [for] a thousand years” (20:1-3) - none of which is even remotely related to the rapture of believers to heaven.

Then, to “the first resurrection”which occurred at the Rapture are added a unique group: “them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshiped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands...they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years” (4, 5).

3. At the Rapture, the bodies of living believers (like those who are resurrected) will be changed to become immortal: “We shall not all sleep [i.e., die], but we shall all be changed...the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we [who are living] shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality” (
1 Cor 15:51-53); “we which are alive...shall be caught up together with them [the resurrected saints]...to meet the Lord in the air [clearly requiring immortal bodies]” (1 Thes 4:17).

In contrast, at the Second Coming all of the saints return with Christ from heaven and will therefore already have been changed into immortality: “the Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with thee” (
Zec 14:5); “I saw heaven opened [and one] clothed with a vesture dipped in blood...and the armies which were in heaven followed him [to] smite the nations” (Rv 19:11-15).

4. The Rapture occurs during relative peace and prosperity, when the world does not expect judgment from God: “And as it was in the days of Noah [the last thing they expected was God’s judgment]...they did eat, they drank...married wives...were given in marriage [and as in] the days of Lot...they bought, they sold...planted...builded....Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.” (
Lk 17:26-30).

Again in complete contrast, the Second Coming occurs in the midst of the worst war the world has ever seen and following the greatest devastation this planet has ever suffered or ever will: “then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world...nor ever shall be. And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved” (Mt 24:21, 22); “behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed...power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger....There was a great earthquake...every mountain and island were moved out of their places...[men] hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks...for the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?” (Rv 6:8-17); “and the four angels were loosed...to slay the third part of men” (9:15); “and the...sea...became as the blood of a dead man: and every living soul died in the sea. And...the rivers and fountains of waters...became blood...the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and...men were scorched with great heat...and...there was a great earthquake, such as was not since men were upon the earth....And every island fled away and the mountains were not found. And there fell upon men a great hail [of large stones]...every stone about the weight of a talent” (16:3-21); “And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True....And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen....And I saw the beast [Antichrist], and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat upon the horse, and against his army. And the beast was taken, and...the false prophet [and they] were cast alive into a lake of fire...” (19:11-21).

5. The Rapture occurs when conditions in the world seem to indicate that all is well, when very few expect Christ to return and He catches even the church by surprise: “of that day and hour knoweth no man...in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh” (Mt 24:36, 44).

In contrast, when the Second Coming occurs, not even Antichrist is caught by surprise—the many visible signs alert everyone that Christ is right at the door: “when ye shall see all these things, know that it [Christ’s coming] is near, even at the doors” (Mt 24:33); “the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse” (Rv 19:19).

6. The Rapture occurs when the church is sleeping, with little expectation of the Lord’s return: “While the bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered and slept” (Mt 25:5); “Watch ye therefore...lest coming suddenly he find you sleeping” (
Mk 13:35, 36).

In contrast, the Second Coming occurs at the end of the Tribulation in the midst of worldwide devastation and hopeless distress; the Antichrist and his armies are attacking Israel, much of Jerusalem is already captured (
Zec 14:1, 2), and Israel is on the verge of annihilation. It is inconceivable that the church, if it were still here, would be slumbering in complacency and under the delusion that “surely Christ wouldn’t come now”!

7. Since the Rapture instantly takes us, without dying, out of this world of sin, pain and sorrow to be forever with Christ and like Him, never more to grieve Him, it is called the “blessed hope”: “Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ” (Ti 2:13); “every man that hath this hope” (
1 Jn 3:3).

In contrast, the Second Coming (or a post-trib rapture at that time) could hardly be called a “blessed hope,” inasmuch as very few Christians (if the church were still here) would survive to enjoy it. Having refused to receive the 666 mark of the beast “in their right hand, or in their forehead” and therefore being unable to “buy or sell,” and refusing to “worship the image of the beast (they would) be killed” (Rv 13:15-17).

It makes no sense to suggest that if you can secretly eat out of enough garbage pails to avoid starvation and still keep one step ahead of Antichrist’s world police death squads, “Blessed hope! You’ll be raptured at Armageddon!”

8. As for the Rapture, unquestionably, the early church was taught to expect it at any moment and to eagerly watch, wait and look for Christ’s return, when He will catch all believers up into His Father’s house to be with Him eternally: “Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning; And ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their lord...” (
Lk 12:35, 36); “For our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body” (Phil 3:20); “...ye turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God; And to wait for his Son from heaven...even Jesus, which delivered us from the wrath to come” (1 Thes 1:9, 10); “looking for that blessed hope” (Ti 2:13); “unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation” (Heb 9:28).

One does not watch, wait and look each day for something that cannot happen until Antichrist’s advent or the end of a seven-year tribulation. Thus, there must be a coming of Christ that could happen at any moment.

In contrast, the Second Coming, by very definition as described in Scripture, cannot be expected momentarily. Therefore, none of the scriptures just quoted concerning watching and waiting and looking for the Lord could refer to the Second Coming or to a post-trib rapture of the church. These scriptures could therefore refer only to a pre-trib rapture.

9. The pre-trib Rapture has a powerful, purifying effect upon those who have this hope in Him. The fact that it is to be expected at any moment can only mean that it must come before Antichrist is revealed and before the Tribulation.

If Christ could come at any moment, there is no time to waste, no time to delay witnessing, no time to indulge in sin with the idea of repenting and changing one’s ways later: “And now, little children, abide in him; that, when he shall appear, we may have confidence, and not be ashamed before him at his coming” (
1 Jn 2:28); “And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure” (3:3).

In contrast, anticipation of the Second Coming (or a post-trib rapture at that time) could hardly have a purifying effect, because it can’t take place for at least seven years—plenty of time to delay witnessing, getting right with the Lord and holy living until later.

In fact, the Lord said that believing he couldn’t come at any moment would have the opposite effect from purifying believers: “If that servant say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming; and shall begin to beat the menservants...and to eat and drink and to be drunken; the lord of that servant will come at an hour when he is not aware (Mt 24:48, 49;
Lk 12:45, 46).

10. The Rapture is not only an event that we are to expect momentarily and to eagerly anticipate, but we are to ask our Lord to come immediately. Here is how the Bible ends: “And the Spirit and the bride say, Come....Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus” (Rv 22:17, 20).

In contrast, the Second Coming is not of such a nature and timing that we could ask Christ to effect it right now. Since Christ obviously cannot return to the earth in judgment to rescue Israel, stop the destruction at Armageddon and destroy the Antichrist along with his kingdom and his armies until the end of the Tribulation, for us to cry out to Christ, “Come, Lord Jesus!” would be like demanding payment on a debt that isn’t due for seven years.

Yet, “the Spirit and the bride” do cry out, “Come, Lord Jesus.” We can only conclude that there must be a coming of Christ that could occur at any moment. It cannot be the Second Coming or a post-trib rapture. It can only be a pre-trib rapture.

11. There are at least two events which occur in heaven for which the church must be present and which, therefore, cannot take place until the Rapture occurs: the judgment seat of Christ, and the marriage of the Lamb to His bride: “for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ” (
Rom 14:10); “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad” (2 Cor 5:10); “the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready. And to her was granted [to] be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white [as a result of her cleansing at the judgment seat of Christ]” (Rv 19:7, 8). Both these events occur prior to Christ’s return to earth and thus demand a prior rapture.

It is clear that the Second Coming cannot occur until these two vital events, which demand the presence of the church in heaven, have taken place. It is only after the Lamb has been married to His bride that she accompanies Him back to earth to rescue Israel and to destroy Antichrist and his armies: “And the armies which were in heaven followed him...clothed in fine linen, white and clean” (Rv 19:14).

We know not why the Bridegroom tarries, but exactly as He foretold, the church is asleep. In that context, our Lord added: “And at midnight there was a cry made, Behold the bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him” (Mt 25:6).

May each of us be listening eagerly for that cry of the Holy Spirit in our hearts. Indeed, we ought to be sounding it aloud, for the Lord could come at any moment to take us to Himself. So let us watch and wait and look for Him in eager anticipation—and encourage others to do the same. It will have a purifying and motivating effect in our lives.

March 11, 2008



The Word "Trinity" Is Not In The Bible.
Does That Mean It Is Not Real?

Some critics of the Trinity doctrine claim that since the word "trinity" is not found in the Bible, it isn't true.

Some assert that if God wanted us to believe in the Trinity, He would have stated the doctrine clearly.

It is illogical to claim that since the word is not found in the Bible, its concept are not taught there. For example, the word "Bible" is not found in the Bible either, but we use it anyway.

Likewise, the words "omniscience," which means "all knowing," "omnipotence," which means "all powerful," and "omnipresence."
This means "present everywhere," are not found in the Bible either. But we use these words to describe the attributes of God.

The words Protestant, Roman Catholic nor pope are not found in the Bible, either.

Following are other words that the Bible does not use but the concepts are mentioned.

Atheism:

The teaching that there is no God. "The fool has said in his heart there is no God." See Psalm 14:1.

Communion:

The word we use to describe the Lord's supper which is taught in 1 Cor. 11:23-27. The word "communion" - is not found in the NASB, NIV, or KJV Bibles.

Divinity:

The word means divine quality or a godlike characteristic, is not in the Bible. Yet, we speak of the godlike quality of the Lord God. See Psalm 139.

Incarnation:

The word means the word (God) who became flesh. Yet, this is definately taught in the Bible. See John 1:1:14.

Monothesim :

The teaching that there is only one God. See Isaiah 43:10; · 44:8.

Rapture:

The teaching that the Christians who are alive when Jesus returns will be caught up to meet Him in the air. See 1 Thess. 4:16-18.

Not all things in the Bible are perfectly clear.

Take a look at the book of Revelation. It contains many things that are not clear and which must be interpreted after examining all of the Bible.


Even then, there are disagreements as to what some things mean. Yet, we know that the truths there are true whether or not we discover them.

TRINITY PROOF

There are several scriptures that demonstrate a Trinitarian aspect.

Matthew. 28:18 says, "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit."

2 Corinthians 13:14 says, "The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit, be with you all."

Ephesians 4:4-7 says, "There is one body and one Spirit, just as also you were called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all who is over all and through all and in all.


"But to each one of us grace was given according to the measure of Christ’s gift."

Jude 20-21 says, "But you, beloved, building yourselves up on your most holy faith; praying in the Holy Spirit; keep yourselves in the love of God, waiting anxiously for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to eternal life."

Those who claim it is either impossible for God to exist in three persons and/or that the Trinity is really borrowed from pagan three-god figures are missing it.

Many add that a person is by necessity an individual being. Therefore, they conclude, that the Trinity really teaches three gods.


The problem with this criticism is that it denies the very nature of the doctrine of the Trinity to begin with.

First:

Trinitarianism denies that there is more than one God. It is clearly monotheistic in spite of what the critics want to claim.

Second:

There is a word used to describe a unity of three separate gods. It is the word "triad." A triad is not a trinity. A triad is three separate gods -- as in Mormonism.

A Trinity is one God in three persons.

A triad is polytheistic.

A Trinity is monotheistic.

Third:

There is no logical reason to deny the possibility that three persons can exist in one God. Critics may not like it, but it is not a logical impossibility.

God is infinitely complex and we cannot understand His vastness nor simply claim He can't exist in three persons.


Instead, we should look at the Bible to see what it says about God and see if the Trinity is taught.

Theologians admit that the word "person" is not the perfect word to use because it carries with it the idea of individuals who are different beings.


This is what we are familiar with and this is one of the problems with using the term "person" when describing the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

But this is what we must use when we see that when the Bible speaks of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, each are called God, each speak, and each have a will. They exhibit attributes of personhood.

In describing what we observe, we are forced to use words that we are familiar with. "Person" is just such a word. But it does not necessitate here that each person is an individual being.

Fourth:

Trinities are known and accepted by people as observed in nature.
We see that creation itself is Trinitarian. Time is past, present, and future.
There are not three times. Likewise, space is height, width, and depth. Matter is solid, liquid, and gas.

The Bible says that God's invisible attributes are made known in creation. Romans 1:20 says, "For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made."

One of the doctrines that many people fail to understand concerning Jesus is the doctrine of the hypostatic union. This is in the teaching that Jesus has two natures: God and man.

In other words, Jesus is both God and man at the same time. This is why we see some scriptures that point to Him being divine and others pointing to Him being a man.
Below is a chart illustrating the two natures of Jesus as derived from scripture.

Jesus is one person, GOD MAN.

He is worshiped. See Matthew 2:2,11; 14:33; 28:9).
He is prayed to. See Acts 7:59; 1 Cor. 1:1-2.
He was called God. See John 20:28; Hebrews. 1:8.
He was called Son of God. See Mark 1:1.
He is sinless. See 1 Pet. 2:22; Hebrews. 4:15.

He knew all things. See John 21:17.
He gives eternal life. See John 20:28.
The fullness of deity dwells in Him. See Col. 2:9.
He worshipped the Father. See John 17.

He prayed to the Father. See John 17:1.
He was called man. See Mark 15:39; John 19:5.
He was called Son of Man. See John 9:35-37.
He was tempted. See Matthew 4:1.

He grew in wisdom. See Luke 2:52.
He died. See Rom. 5:8.
He has a body of flesh and bones. See Luke 24:39.

The Trinity is not a made-up doctrine. Rather, it is a doctrine derived from studying God's word.

It is true that God cannot die. It is also true that man can die. But we see that Jesus has two natures, not one.

It was the human part of Jesus that died on the cross, not the divine.


But, because He is both God and man in one person, and because He was sinless, His sacrifice is sufficient to cover the sins of the world.